Re: does BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: does BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10
Date: 2025-10-22 16:44:04
Message-ID: CANzqJaAZapvw5oTV3KY2YaY3qnixLiV-VA3ACtSZRgBZ-g66fg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 11:53 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2025-Oct-22, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Our release notes don't usually mention bug numbers.
>
> > Maybe we should add that.
>
> I don't think so, because as often as not there is no bug number.
>

When there is, you can add it!

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pär Mattsson 2025-10-23 08:59:23 PGbackrest very slow!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-10-22 15:53:13 Re: does BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10