Re: does BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Ishan Arunkumar Joshi <ishan(dot)joshi(at)netcracker(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: does BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10
Date: 2025-10-22 15:53:13
Message-ID: 795518.1761148393@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> writes:
> On 2025-Oct-22, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Our release notes don't usually mention bug numbers.

> Maybe we should add that.

I don't think so, because as often as not there is no bug number.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2025-10-22 16:44:04 Re: does BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-10-22 15:38:07 Re: does BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10