Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots

From: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots
Date: 2025-10-23 07:49:24
Message-ID: CANhcyEW6Kh3X2tApAYh5M7Od3Fv+skBEo4vhcn6C6mZb17hoNQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 09:36, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 9:05 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > As Ashutosh suggests I will go more for the backpatching approach because the synchronized_standby_slots parameter impacts the last 2 major versions and this problem is critical on production environments.
> > >
> >
> > Fair enough. Let's wait for the related issue being discussed in email
> > [1] to be fixed.
> >
>
> As the other patch is committed
> (f33e60a53a9ca89b5078df49416acae20affe1f5), can you update and prepare
> backbranch patches for this fix as well?
>
Hi Amit,

Please find the updated patch.

v6-0001 : It applies on HEAD and REL_18_STABLE branches
v6_REL_17-0001 : It applies on REL_17_STABLE branch.

Since this GUC was introduced in PG_17, we do not need to back-patch
to PG_16 or prior.

Thanks,
Shlok Kyal

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6_REL_17-0001-Remove-the-validation-from-the-GUC-check-h.patch application/octet-stream 5.5 KB
v6-0001-Remove-the-validation-from-the-GUC-check-hook-and.patch application/octet-stream 6.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-10-23 07:52:29 Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2025-10-23 07:22:39 Re: Tab completion for large objects