| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots |
| Date: | 2025-10-23 04:06:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+-CkA62eeNVB3HH_Ss1JSOyFLmS+M93yWw6W+x8O91Ng@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 9:05 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > As Ashutosh suggests I will go more for the backpatching approach because the synchronized_standby_slots parameter impacts the last 2 major versions and this problem is critical on production environments.
> >
>
> Fair enough. Let's wait for the related issue being discussed in email
> [1] to be fixed.
>
As the other patch is committed
(f33e60a53a9ca89b5078df49416acae20affe1f5), can you update and prepare
backbranch patches for this fix as well?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-10-23 04:08:22 | Re: [PATCH] Free memory allocated by waitonlock_error_callback() |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2025-10-23 03:43:36 | Re: Issue with query_is_distinct_for() and grouping sets |