From: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ilya Anfimov <ilan(at)tzirechnoy(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) |
Date: | 2022-07-26 18:35:13 |
Message-ID: | CANbhV-EyjMGLeTvHXwg4DtTbBFZ8VpM5kJtVxrE=h_suKuRDpw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 12:29, Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> Personally I didn't expect that
> merging patches in this thread would take that long. They are in
> "Ready for Committer" state for a long time now and there are no known
> issues with them other than unit tests for SLRU [1] should be merged
> first.
These patches look ready to me, including the SLRU tests.
Even though they do very little, these patches touch many aspects of
the code, so it would make sense to apply these as the last step in
the CF.
To encourage committers to take that next step, let's have a
democratic vote on moving this forwards:
+1 from me.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-07-26 18:37:19 | Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-26 18:30:30 | Re: Unstable tests for recovery conflict handling |