Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
Date: 2024-01-19 07:27:11
Message-ID: CANWCAZbEOdBagWQh9Omb=MiwjGJ88MNd-6ZYhxbwQXWPh0J4hA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:54 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:

> Maybe something like:
>
> "
> Building blocks for creating fast inlineable hash functions. The
> functions in this file are not guaranteed to be stable between versions,
> and may differ by hardware platform. Hence they must not be used in
> indexes or other on-disk structures. See hashfn.h if you need stability.
> "
>
> typo: licencse
>
> Other than that, LGTM.

Pushed that way, thanks! After fixing another typo in big endian
builds, an s390x member reported green, so I think that aspect is
working now. I'll come back to follow-up topics shortly.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message feichanghong 2024-01-19 07:35:24 logical decoding build wrong snapshot with subtransactions
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-01-19 07:26:17 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum