| From: | Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | application_name in process name? |
| Date: | 2016-07-13 16:21:55 |
| Message-ID: | CANPAkgt7ODv8QHSeooTe2wzB-xswN2c5aLE6ag+W2PrYP+kraQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
There are times when it would be useful to have the application_name
connection parameter displayed in the process name - and thus in ps and
pg_top - in addition to the user and database name.
Would there be any downside to this? If it were done, are there any
suggestions on how it could be added the process name so as to minimize
impact on anything that might be trying to parse that line?
__________________________________________________________________________________
*Mike Blackwell | Technical Analyst, Distribution Services/Rollout
Management | RR Donnelley*
1750 Wallace Ave | St Charles, IL 60174-3401
Office: 630.313.7818
Mike(dot)Blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com
http://www.rrdonnelley.com
<http://www.rrdonnelley.com/>
* <Mike(dot)Blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-07-13 16:38:17 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-07-13 15:06:52 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |