Re: pgsql: Avoid pin scan for replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Avoid pin scan for replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM
Date: 2016-01-09 18:27:47
Message-ID: CANP8+jLxMQkpJ9hsjEZxcM_8bZsJU_=aJn9BHPYx56tuKGMecQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 9 January 2016 at 18:08, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2016-01-09 17:58:01 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 9 January 2016 at 12:23, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2016-01-09 10:13:27 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > > src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/nbtdesc.c | 2 +-
> > >
> > > I've not reviewed the patch, but a very quick glance during a rebase
> > > with conflicts showed:
> > >
> > > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ btree_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
> > > {
> > > xl_btree_vacuum *xlrec = (xl_btree_vacuum *) rec;
> > >
> > > - appendStringInfo(buf, "lastBlockVacuumed %u",
> > > + appendStringInfo(buf, "lastBlockVacuumed %d",
> > > xlrec->lastBlockVacuumed);
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > which doesn't look right?
> > >
> >
> > It's right. New value of -1 allowed in that field, so change required to
> > allow it to display properly for debug.
>
> Uh. xl_btree_vacuum->lastBlockVacuumed is of type BlockNumber, which in
> turn is of type uint32. So no, this isn't correct as is.
>

OK, agreed. Will fix.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-01-09 18:32:12 pgsql: Revoke change to rmgr desc of btree vacuum
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-01-09 18:08:47 Re: pgsql: Avoid pin scan for replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2016-01-09 18:30:45 Re: pglogical - logical replication contrib module
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-01-09 18:27:13 Re: Speedup twophase transactions