Re: pgsql: Avoid pin scan for replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Avoid pin scan for replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM
Date: 2016-01-09 18:08:47
Message-ID: 20160109180847.hzsjrwlwvsbacfgs@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 2016-01-09 17:58:01 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 9 January 2016 at 12:23, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2016-01-09 10:13:27 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/nbtdesc.c | 2 +-
> >
> > I've not reviewed the patch, but a very quick glance during a rebase
> > with conflicts showed:
> >
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ btree_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
> > {
> > xl_btree_vacuum *xlrec = (xl_btree_vacuum *) rec;
> >
> > - appendStringInfo(buf, "lastBlockVacuumed %u",
> > + appendStringInfo(buf, "lastBlockVacuumed %d",
> > xlrec->lastBlockVacuumed);
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > which doesn't look right?
> >
>
> It's right. New value of -1 allowed in that field, so change required to
> allow it to display properly for debug.

Uh. xl_btree_vacuum->lastBlockVacuumed is of type BlockNumber, which in
turn is of type uint32. So no, this isn't correct as is.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-01-09 18:27:47 Re: pgsql: Avoid pin scan for replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-09 18:03:48 pgsql: Add STRICT to some C functions created by the regression tests.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-01-09 18:27:13 Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-09 18:04:14 Re: [PATCH] Add STRICT to some regression test C functions.