Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning
Date: 2017-02-23 16:08:45
Message-ID: CANP8+jLH5poBiZ5FW2MQ_9Coz17kXxhL4BWxuF=zMstgP1y_1g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 February 2017 at 19:57, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:

> FWIW, I agree that some of what has been claimed about what
> contributors failed to do with this patch is exaggerated, and not in a
> way that I'd understand as hyperbole that drives home a deeper point.

What claims are you talking about? Which things have been exaggerated,
and by whom?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-02-23 16:10:39 Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2017-02-23 15:51:46 Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)