| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |
| Date: | 2017-02-24 05:11:43 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jKurhXuQPjHWTLBF9QSuyZ+pHCE61rsBfEDH+AP35NCzA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 February 2017 at 04:41, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Okay. As suggested by Alexander, I have changed the order of reading and
> doing initdb for each pgbench run. With these changes, I got following
> results at 300 scale factor with 8GB of shared buffer.
>
Would you be able to test my patch also please?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Venkata B Nagothi | 2017-02-24 05:13:45 | Re: Range Partitioning behaviour - query |
| Previous Message | Venkata B Nagothi | 2017-02-24 05:11:40 | Re: Range Partitioning behaviour - query |