Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?

From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date: 2017-02-24 06:52:26
Message-ID: CAE9k0PkpOJkPXWrv_dqu_fhjw4+XW=weN_6kyUZXXZw0rxGRdQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 24 February 2017 at 04:41, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Okay. As suggested by Alexander, I have changed the order of reading and
>> doing initdb for each pgbench run. With these changes, I got following
>> results at 300 scale factor with 8GB of shared buffer.
>
>
> Would you be able to test my patch also please?
>

Sure, I can do that and share the results by early next week. Thanks.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2017-02-24 06:53:04 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-02-24 06:47:44 Re: Poor memory context performance in large hash joins