Re: On-disk format of SCRAM verifiers

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: On-disk format of SCRAM verifiers
Date: 2017-04-21 13:02:32
Message-ID: CANP8+jKYr1R0ZP0AdgiurcO4NZOnW26exzJ1pAwQ7b6dx54r2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21 April 2017 at 10:20, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:

> But looking more closely, I think I misunderstood RFC 5803. It *does* in
> fact specify a single string format to store the verifier in. And the format
> looks like:
>
> SCRAM-SHA-256$<iteration count>:<salt>$<StoredKey>:<ServerKey>

Could you explain where you are looking? I don't see that in RFC5803

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-04-21 13:08:33 Old versions of Test::More
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-21 12:49:40 Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION, query cancellations and slot handling