Re: Let PostgreSQL's On Schedule checkpoint write buffer smooth spread cycle by tuning IsCheckpointOnSchedule?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: digoal zhou <digoal(dot)zhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let PostgreSQL's On Schedule checkpoint write buffer smooth spread cycle by tuning IsCheckpointOnSchedule?
Date: 2015-07-02 10:46:59
Message-ID: CANP8+jJxOjiG4isUExa-7kt++mqrhKAsbZ9uxuz9oKVu6JSPUw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13 May 2015 at 09:35, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:

> In summary, the X^1.5 correction seems to work pretty well. It doesn't
> completely eliminate the problem, but it makes it a lot better.
>

Agreed

> I don't want to over-compensate for the full-page-write effect either,
> because there are also applications where that effect isn't so big. For
> example, an application that performs a lot of updates, but all the updates
> are on a small number of pages, so the full-page-write storm immediately
> after checkpoint doesn't last long. A worst case for this patch would be
> such an application - lots of updates on only a few pages - with a long
> checkpoint_timeoout but relatively small checkpoint_segments, so that
> checkpoints are always driven by checkpoint_segments. I'd like to see some
> benchmarking of that worst case before committing anything like this.
>

We could do better, but that is not a reason not to commit this, as is.
Commit, please.

This has been in place for a while and still remains: TODO: reduce impact
of full page writes

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2015-07-02 10:55:26 Re: raw output from copy
Previous Message David Rowley 2015-07-02 10:08:23 Re: Patch to improve a few appendStringInfo* calls