Re: Release Note changes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release Note changes
Date: 2017-09-04 12:36:31
Message-ID: CANP8+jJtU85pqTGALh7+WgXYf8cJHByOoajFW09swhEhG9KKkA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4 September 2017 at 12:11, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It's not really true that the only alternatives to pglogical are
> proprietary. Really, one could use any logical replication solution,
> and there have been multiple open source alternatives for a decade.

True, but it is by far the best solution out of the many choices.

Which is why next year when upgrading from PG10 -> PG11 we will
mention it and that point not mention the other older solutions, which
were once our best.

>> Our docs mention pglogical already, so don't see an issue with
>> mentioning it here.
>
> The existing reference is alongside a bunch of other third-party
> tools. Mentioning it at the very top of our release notes would give
> it a pride of place with which I'm not too comfortable.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message postgresql_2016@163.com 2017-09-04 12:50:07 【ECPG】strncpy function does not set the end character '\0'
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-09-04 12:32:14 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables