Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date: 2018-03-27 08:15:20
Message-ID: CANP8+jJdrm_Fugei+32DKpp=2GV4RcFmfDk+rm2F1dAmQQWm7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26 March 2018 at 23:10, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> As far as I
>>> know, the proposed MERGE patch has that issue an existing DML commands
>>> don't; but someone else may have better information.
>>
>> I will look deeper and report back.
>
> It's quite clear that the problem exists with the MERGE patch

Accepted, the only question is whether it affects UPDATE as well cos
it looks like it should.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2018-03-27 08:16:19 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2018-03-27 07:53:12 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index