Re: Minor improvement for inval.c header comment

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor improvement for inval.c header comment
Date: 2017-04-13 09:09:46
Message-ID: CANP8+jJLx9-g9aomVHOaTk8mpUssJiLRyGNrf6NZaKLmqmz+uw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13 April 2017 at 09:27, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Attached patch modifies a sentence in the inval.c header comment to
> mention that operations on a pg_index tuple also registers relcache flush
> operation.

Correctly observed. Patch pushed.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-04-13 09:36:27 Re: Minor improvement for inval.c header comment
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-04-13 08:27:57 Minor improvement for inval.c header comment