Re: Minor improvement for inval.c header comment

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor improvement for inval.c header comment
Date: 2017-04-13 09:36:27
Message-ID: 4ac38fc6-6afa-8929-dca5-bc03ce5f39e0@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/04/13 18:09, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 13 April 2017 at 09:27, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Attached patch modifies a sentence in the inval.c header comment to
>> mention that operations on a pg_index tuple also registers relcache flush
>> operation.
>
> Correctly observed. Patch pushed.

Thanks.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-04-13 09:42:19 Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-04-13 09:09:46 Re: Minor improvement for inval.c header comment