Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists(at)toco-domains(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
Date: 2016-03-10 15:30:05
Message-ID: CANP8+j+4mSKMsRmLRfA4sm-D4p8GVm7RXHFTPuUPwZNKo08Z6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 March 2016 at 06:53, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> I'm pretty meh about the whole idea of this function, though,
> >> actually, and I don't see a single clear +1 vote for this
> >> functionality upthread. (Apologies if I've missed one.) In the
> >> absence of a few of those, I recommend we reject this.
> >
> > +1
>
> I'm meh for this patch.
>

"meh" == +1

I thought it meant -1

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-10 15:35:56 Re: Endless loop calling PL/Python set returning functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-10 15:26:47 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function