Re: Session in aborted transaction misses effective_wal_level change

From: Sergei Patiakin <sergei(dot)patiakin(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "msawada(at)postgresql(dot)org" <msawada(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Session in aborted transaction misses effective_wal_level change
Date: 2026-10-06 09:19:42
Message-ID: CANE55rAwHBqDpgETyV_ro8Ow42PS9NkhP-PRSTFSf3yhgA8g6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Masahiko,

> I've attached the updated patch. Please review it.

Looks good. I confirmed the v3 test changes fail on `master` and pass
with the v3 code changes.

Best regards,
Sergei

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2026-10-06 09:22:50 Re: Publication DDL can race with a concurrent UPDATE
Previous Message solai v 2026-10-06 08:52:40 Re: [SP-]GiST IOS visibility bug (was: Why doens't GiST require super-exclusive lock)