| From: | Keisuke Kuroda <keisuke(dot)kuroda(dot)3862(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add support for entry counting in pgstats |
| Date: | 2025-09-24 02:37:25 |
| Message-ID: | CANDwgg+-yv-TZQ+45R2RMgo=ueF1yfFMn=A1gXJUokK+ExTNEg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Testing via the Injection Point has been successfully completed.
> The option is named track_counts.
Regarding the option name track_counts in PgStat_KindInfo.
In my personal opinion, I was just wondering that it shares
the same name as the GUC track_counts(pgstat_track_counts in the source code).
If we want to make it clearer, renaming it to track_entry_counts
could be one option.
(That said, I feel the GUC track_counts option has a mismatch
between its role and its name...)
Best Regards,
--
Keisuke Kuroda
NTT DOCOMO SOLUTIONS, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2025-09-24 02:46:39 | Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - take2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-09-24 01:23:08 | Re: Inconsistent Behavior of GROUP BY ROLLUP in v17 vs master |