| From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Build the docs if there are changes in docs and don't run other tasks if the changes are only in docs |
| Date: | 2023-12-14 13:40:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAN55FZ3Z2hVcZA+VRp-VzAYKAD-i+WYzSrqjgyYmRL3rMmT7sA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 17:07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> As a quick cross-check, I searched our commit log to see how many
> README-only commits there were so far this year. I found 11 since
> January. (Several were triggered by the latest round of pgindent
> code and process changes, so maybe this is more than typical.)
>
> Not sure what that tells us about the value of changing the CI
> logic, but it does seem like it could be worth the one-liner
> change needed to teach buildfarm animals to ignore READMEs.
I agree that it could be worth implementing this logic on buildfarm animals.
In case we want to implement the same logic on the CI, I added a new
version of the patch; it skips CI completely if the changes are only
in the README files.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-If-the-changes-are-only-in-the-README-files-skip-.patch | text/x-diff | 1.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-12-14 13:53:27 | Re: Simplify newNode() |
| Previous Message | Federico | 2023-12-14 13:21:24 | Re: Improve upcasting for INT range and multi range types |