| From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Date: | 2025-10-03 11:48:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAN55FZ1vrMRRFRX+GUg=VgRuLxXKAta4cmU9TdOTG9azVrhDfg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 23:16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> > I suspect what you're really after here is the functionality of the
> > check-tabs and check-nbsp targets. So the new Perl script really just
> > has to cover those two and doesn't have to bother with xmllint. And
> > then you just call that script as part of the postgres-full.xml target.
>
> Yeah, that's what I was imagining: replace the xmllint call in
> postgres-full.xml with this new script that will also run the
> tab/nbsp checks.
Does not this mean we can not run the syntax check by itself in the
make builds? If I understand correctly, we need to create
postgres-full.xml each time we want to run the syntax check, right?
I was under the impression that the sgml_syntax_check.pl test would be
a lightweight way to do a syntax check, so that we could easily use it
by itself or in the CI.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2025-10-03 11:49:42 | Re: Add memory_limit_hits to pg_stat_replication_slots |
| Previous Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2025-10-03 11:28:23 | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |