Re: ci: namespace ccache by PostgreSQL major version

From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ci: namespace ccache by PostgreSQL major version
Date: 2026-07-21 11:26:35
Message-ID: CAN55FZ1fCyuHU0bjApV6QBRhPwDBmO1wj7FeM7S3xSdzQziodw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 at 23:46, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
>
> On Fri Jul 17, 2026 at 6:14 PM CEST, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > Something like the attached, all done Claude. I'm gonna enjoy my weekend
> > now though. Feel free to take this over.
>
> Changed it a bit and tried it out. This works pretty well and seems like
> a nice improvement for people that actually backpatch things. I think I
> like this simplicity a lot better than the patch I submitted earlier to
> run CI on PRs.

I think this is a nice improvement for the people who backpatch things
and have feature branches.

Since this CI run will only run for updating the cache, I think
running tests etc. are not important and time consuming. What do you
think about disabling them for these types of CI runs; so they will
only build, then update the cache and done?

--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shlok Kyal 2026-07-21 11:28:14 Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade
Previous Message Shlok Kyal 2026-07-21 11:04:41 Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade