Re: ci: namespace ccache by PostgreSQL major version

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ci: namespace ccache by PostgreSQL major version
Date: 2026-07-21 11:54:57
Message-ID: CAGECzQQXA3HxiLOm3Gtd+ioPyBro-EEUJdzad1quyvMVmHH1+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 at 13:26, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Since this CI run will only run for updating the cache, I think
> running tests etc. are not important and time consuming. What do you
> think about disabling them for these types of CI runs; so they will
> only build, then update the cache and done?

Sounds reasonable to me

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2026-07-21 12:05:51 Re: ri_Fast* crash w/ nullable UNIQUE constraint
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2026-07-21 11:37:07 RE: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES