From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Eagerly evict bulkwrite strategy ring |
Date: | 2025-09-12 07:16:14 |
Message-ID: | CAN55FZ0CTPnDdNszwDKpfdACHDhY12ArybH4smyD_QEJ+msQZg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Sept 2025 at 02:17, Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> While looking at this, I decided it didn't make sense to have sweep
> variables in the strategy object, so I've actually changed the way
> StrategySweepNextBuffer() works. There was also an issue with the
> sweep -- it could run into and past the starting buffer. So, I had to
> change it. Take a look at the new method and let me know what you
> think.
It looks good to me. StrategySweepNextBuffer()'s comment is no longer
correct, though.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-09-12 07:23:05 | Add support for entry counting in pgstats |
Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2025-09-12 07:02:16 | Re: OAuth client code doesn't work with Google OAuth |