Re: Eagerly evict bulkwrite strategy ring

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Eagerly evict bulkwrite strategy ring
Date: 2025-10-15 21:00:30
Message-ID: CAAKRu_Y9WeWb5fu7Aibh-qGZuFYq3=57Y4ptSrzLYCnRWDHCow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 3:16 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It looks good to me. StrategySweepNextBuffer()'s comment is no longer
> correct, though.

Ah, thanks. I think I fixed that. I also rebased the set and attached v5.

- Melanie

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Refactor-goto-into-for-loop-in-GetVictimBuffer.patch text/x-patch 12.3 KB
v5-0002-Split-FlushBuffer-into-two-parts.patch text/x-patch 7.8 KB
v5-0003-Eagerly-flush-bulkwrite-strategy-ring.patch text/x-patch 12.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2025-10-15 21:10:47 Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2025-10-15 20:56:55 Re: Checkpointer write combining