| From: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Planet posting policy |
| Date: | 2011-07-15 06:34:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAN1EF+xo4LkBnyvEWkapjqBEp_vSy8G0K54HJwZTczR0oFskBQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I think there could be value in having both a strictly focused planet
> and a more broader one. But I wouldn't want to *replace* the former by
> the latter.
It is interesting, but the policy about "postgres-relevant" helps
avoid conflicts about content of other types. I don't want to get more
into the business of fielding questions about appropriateness of
content on a more general feed, or censoring inappropriate content.
Or, honestly, defining what appropriate would be on a broader planet.
Seems like an epic bikeshedding opportunity.
-selena
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-07-15 09:00:26 | Re: Planet posting policy |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-07-15 06:17:46 | Re: Planet posting policy |