| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Planet posting policy |
| Date: | 2011-07-15 05:08:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1310706537.13354.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On tor, 2011-07-14 at 20:51 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 07:29 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> Can we not remember that as people in this community that actually
> >> makes the post relevant to postgresql?
> >
> > I look forward to being able to direct a less filtered version of my
> > blog into the Planet if PostgreSQL relevancy stops being a requirement.
> > You all are going to love my weekly posts about new prog metal bands
> > I've discovered.
> >
>
> Well I would. I can always chose to not read a post if I don't find it
> interesting. It is that whole free will thing.
I think there could be value in having both a strictly focused planet
and a more broader one. But I wouldn't want to *replace* the former by
the latter.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-07-15 06:17:46 | Re: Planet posting policy |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-07-15 03:51:00 | Re: Planet posting policy |