Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) loses missing values of columns added without a rewrite

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) loses missing values of columns added without a rewrite
Date: 2026-09-23 18:41:13
Message-ID: CAN12+Y+p-+uqwKAnqXN=hAUR5wFrb5o6DnJwa=kKaveLtaTqhw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> v2 fixes the issue you mentioned.

Thanks for checking!

> I think It also fixes another case. If the added column is in the replica
> identity index, REPACK looks up the row with a NULL key. That fails the
> Assert in find_target_tuple(), or gives "could not find target tuple"
> without assertions. Adding this to the test covers it:
>
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX repack_test_i_c_idx ON repack_test (i, c);
> ALTER TABLE repack_test REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX repack_test_i_c_idx;

ahh, good repro. It's worse for a pass-by-reference column, i.e. TEXT.
find_target_tuple() only sets sk_argument, never SK_ISNULL, so the
comparison function gets a NULL pointer rather than a NULL key.
So a non assert build will actually segfault.

v3 uses a TEXT column in the identity index, which covers the int case
too since both go through the same sk_argument.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Fix-REPACK-CONCURRENTLY-for-columns-added-without.patch application/octet-stream 9.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-09-23 18:42:57 Re: CI slowdown due to PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS
Previous Message Manu 2026-09-23 18:29:45 Re: Add a test for index_rebuild_count of REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)