Re: CI slowdown due to PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CI slowdown due to PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS
Date: 2026-09-23 18:42:57
Message-ID: CAGECzQQ-3fiUCvWyraAAac26ZsX4f9G4dq8zjQukb_Rrxj9gjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 at 08:56, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached is an attempt to implement 'PG_TEST_SERVER_POSTGRES_OPTS'.

I'm starting to get kinda annoyed that this (or my earlier version)
hasn't been committed yet, or at least made some progress. There's a
trivial way to improve CI runtime by 25-30%. Why has this patch been
in limbo for more than 2 months?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2026-09-23 18:41:13 Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) loses missing values of columns added without a rewrite