| From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring |
| Date: | 2018-09-26 07:50:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAN-RpxBQX834juPjwmsKha9RwESU5Br8XSrcdXv326-VYF00=g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:41 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:27:35PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2018-09-25 11:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> PGDLLIMPORT changes don't get back-patched as well...
> >
> > We've been more aggressive with that lately, and I think that's good. It
> > just is a unnecessarily portability barrier for extension to be
> > judicious in applying that.
>
> Agreed. Are there any objections with the proposal of changing the
> interruption pending flags in miscadmin.h to use sig_atomic_t?
> ClientConnectionLost would gain PGDLLIMPORT at the same time.
>
I am strongly in favor of doing this.
> --
> Michael
>
--
Best Regards,
Chris Travers
Head of Database
Tel: +49 162 9037 210 | Skype: einhverfr | www.adjust.com
Saarbrücker Straße 37a, 10405 Berlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2018-09-26 07:54:36 | Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring |
| Previous Message | Tahir Ramzan | 2018-09-26 07:31:20 | Re: Participate in GCI as a Mentor |