Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Date: 2018-09-26 22:48:36
Message-ID: 20180926224836.GN1659@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:50:00AM +0200, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:41 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote:
>> Agreed. Are there any objections with the proposal of changing the
>> interruption pending flags in miscadmin.h to use sig_atomic_t?
>> ClientConnectionLost would gain PGDLLIMPORT at the same time.
>
> I am strongly in favor of doing this.

Okay, done.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-09-26 22:48:47 Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-09-26 22:45:47 Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works