Re: remaining sql/json patches

From: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date: 2023-11-03 15:20:03
Message-ID: CAN-LCVO1sbBE4VdzSRqkSOdKNaD-KztZFR1oWvJmiqOuM3HNpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

Read Tom Lane's note in previous discussion (quite long, so I've missed it)
on pg_proc column -

>I strongly recommend against having a new pg_proc column at all.
>I doubt that you really need it, and having one will create
>enormous mechanical burdens to making the conversion. (For example,
>needing a catversion bump every time we convert one more function,
>or an extension version bump to convert extensions.)

so should figure out another way to do it.

Regards,
--
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-11-03 15:30:17 Re: [PATCH] Add XMLText function (SQL/XML X038)
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-11-03 14:53:30 Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible