Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Date: 2018-06-01 03:46:05
Message-ID: CAMsr+YHyLSuBTp-cd=PPnM-DHponS23_6cpBvC9-auONZRmRjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28 May 2018 at 15:06, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Per topic, the Pg makefiles install pg_regress (for use by extensions) and
> htey install the isolationtester, but they don't install
> pg_isolation_regress.
>
> We should install it too.
>

Now with a patch that isn't brain-dead.

I'm wondering if I should add ISOLATION support to PGXS too, like we have
REGRESS .

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Install-pg_isolation_regress-not-just-isolationte.patch text/x-patch 883 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-06-01 04:56:22 ToDo: show size of partitioned table
Previous Message MauMau 2018-06-01 03:00:36 Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon