Re: snapbuild woes

From: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
Date: 2016-12-11 07:17:42
Message-ID: CAMsr+YH_+NPbmkGSqNbtwut2d-1a8Y5TNDA_gkMpTgsDL9Bx2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11 Dec. 2016 06:50, "Petr Jelinek" <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

On 10/12/16 23:10, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>
> The attached 0002-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch changes this
> behavior so that we don't make snapshots for transactions that we seen
> wholly and know that they didn't make catalog changes even if we didn't
> reach consistency yet.
>

Eh, attached wrong patch. This one is correct.

Attached no patch second time?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Borodin 2016-12-11 08:16:59 Re: pg_background contrib module proposal
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-12-11 07:04:27 Re: Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?