From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vladimir Gordiychuk <folyga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Stopping logical replication protocol |
Date: | 2016-11-03 13:44:29 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YGy_JM+xJwHVg_KxH82Yk-qVqxy_UgPZn=c4BY7bfE0Mg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 October 2016 at 19:38, Vladimir Gordiychuk <folyga(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Craig, Andres what do you thinks about previous message?
I haven't had a chance to look further to be honest.
Since a downstream disconnect works, though it's ugly, it's not
something I can justify spending a lot of time on, and I already did
spend a lot on it in patch review/updating/testing etc.
I don't know what Andres wants, but I think CopyFail with
ERRCODE_QUERY_CANCELED is fine.
As for plugins that collect changes in memory and only send them on
commit, I'd call them "broken". Not an interesting case IMO. Don't do
that.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-03 13:46:28 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-11-03 13:31:20 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |