Re: Packages: Again

From: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packages: Again
Date: 2017-01-12 00:12:03
Message-ID: CAMsr+YG85s9WOZY66=KKgv=b24hfV16qiUsAvv_TjHjT4dWMqA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12 Jan. 2017 02:59, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

-hackers,

I know we have talked about this before but today it was impressed upon me
rather firmly. I presented a Webinar: Postgres for Oracle People. The
attendees were 90% pl/pgsql developers. 330 people registered for an event
that was only allowed to host 100 people. The webinar went on for 2 hours.
(it was only scheduled for one hour, that is how interactive it was)

By far the tagline of this webinar from attendees was, "We can not port
without packages"

What aspects / features of packages were the key issues?

Initialisation?

Variables?

Performance features like pre compilation?

Signing?

Code obfuscation?

...?

So this is a reality. If we want tried and true Oracle developers to port
to PostgreSQL, we must provide some level of package capability.

There are some that would say we don't need them. You are right, we don't
need them. We should however want them if we want to continue to stomp
through the business sector and continue growth.

I use this post to inspire conversation on how we can get this done.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2017-01-12 00:29:19 Retiring from the Core Team
Previous Message Gilles Darold 2017-01-11 23:40:09 Re: Packages: Again