Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2017-01-24 08:27:58
Message-ID: CAMsr+YET57YUnePwhs_GMKLwCrPAo_=Q4hc-DrbDxRnYA01qxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 Jan. 2017 18:00, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

On 2017-01-24 15:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am marking this patch as "returned with feedback". That's quite a
> heavy change and it looks to be too late in the development cycle of
> PG10 to consider it. Peter's commit bits, who is also the reviewer,
> are beginning to smoke as well after everything that has happened for
> the logical replication changes.

I'm doubtful about this being ready in time too, but it seems a might
heavyhanded to make that call on your own. Including the judgement about
Peter's capability to handle more.

Personally I think we should aim to have this in as a non default build
mode in pg10 if it can be made ready, and aim to make it default in pg11 at
least for Windows.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-01-24 08:34:38 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Previous Message Mithun Cy 2017-01-24 08:26:03 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.