| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Date: | 2017-01-24 06:58:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20170124065848.yawgnrpqihvahj5u@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-01-24 15:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am marking this patch as "returned with feedback". That's quite a
> heavy change and it looks to be too late in the development cycle of
> PG10 to consider it. Peter's commit bits, who is also the reviewer,
> are beginning to smoke as well after everything that has happened for
> the logical replication changes.
I'm doubtful about this being ready in time too, but it seems a might
heavyhanded to make that call on your own. Including the judgement about
Peter's capability to handle more.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-24 07:00:16 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-01-24 06:53:05 | Re: Checksums by default? |