Re: Named Operators

From: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Named Operators
Date: 2023-01-12 17:02:37
Message-ID: CAMsGm5d3mBF=PQiHKV0ptXNiMW34aZ3u=44ams7ObWbZYfsRLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 05:59, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> wrote:

I'll consider using one of the other special characters. Do you have
> any suggestions?
>

What about backticks (`)? They are allowed as operator characters but do
not otherwise appear in the lexical syntax as far as I can tell:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-syntax-lexical.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isaac Morland 2023-01-12 17:06:13 Re: Remove source code display from \df+?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-01-12 17:00:59 Re: drop postmaster symlink