Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats

From: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
Date: 2023-02-19 09:57:31
Message-ID: CAMm1aWZfo0pLm0rJjyi=Ucte1eGibumWT2VtQ4qMW-DTxEtaTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This doesn't pass the tests, because the regression tests weren't adjusted:
> https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5937624817336320/testrun/build/testrun/regress/regress/regression.diffs

Thanks for sharing this. I have fixed this in the patch attached.

>> IMO, there's no need for 2 separate patches for these changes.
> I will make it a single patch while sharing the next patch.

Clubbed both patches into one.

Thanks & Regards,
Nitin Jadhav

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:08 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-12-21 17:14:12 +0530, Nitin Jadhav wrote:
> > Kindly review and share your comments.
>
> This doesn't pass the tests, because the regression tests weren't adjusted:
>
> https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5937624817336320/testrun/build/testrun/regress/regress/regression.diffs

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Fix-inconsistency-in-reporting-checkpointer-stats.patch application/octet-stream 9.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com 2023-02-19 13:06:02 RE: Rework LogicalOutputPluginWriterUpdateProgress
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-02-19 07:25:57 Re: Handle TEMP_CONFIG for pg_regress style tests in pg_regress.c