From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Monitoring of a hot standby with a largely idle master |
Date: | 2017-07-14 19:11:19 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1zqXGpOTTH1HRVisZebQuJdGmvG6Ei2nxpFb_D25pH-TQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I think that pg_stat_wal_receiver should be crossreferenced in
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/hot-standby.html, near the
> same
> > place which it crossreferences table 9-79. That would make it more
> > discoverable.
>
> Hm. Hot standby may not involve streaming replication. What about a
> paragraph here instead?
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/warm-standby.html#streaming-
> replication
>
> In the monitoring subsection, we could tell that on a standby the WAL
> receiver status can be retrieved from this view when changes are
> streamed. What do you think?
>
That works for me.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhu, Joshua | 2017-07-15 00:00:50 | puzzled by deletion performance |
Previous Message | marcelo | 2017-07-14 17:41:33 | Re: What is exactly a schema? |