Re: proposal: row_to_array function

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: row_to_array function
Date: 2015-03-28 22:53:50
Message-ID: CAMkU=1zQ6PvJ2=mQuQgvUcBVmMR7U1GmTHM4JhQSNfFLyYe2SA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> 2015-01-27 11:41 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-26 21:44 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>:
>>
>>> On 1/25/15 4:23 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I tested a concept iteration over array in format [key1, value1, key2,
>>>> value2, .. ] - what is nice, it works for [[key1,value1],[key2, value2],
>>>> ...] too
>>>>
>>>> It is only a few lines more to current code, and this change doesn't
>>>> break a compatibility.
>>>>
>>>> Do you think, so this patch is acceptable?
>>>>
>>>> Ideas, comments?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Aside from fixing the comments... I think this needs more tests on
>>> corner cases. For example, what happens when you do
>>>
>>> foreach a, b, c in array(array(1,2),array(3,4)) ?
>>>
>>
>> it is relative simple behave -- empty values are NULL
>>
>> array(1,2),array(3,4) -- do you think ARRAY[[1,2],[3,4]] is effectively
>> ARRAY[1,2,3,4]
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Or the opposite case of
>>>
>>> foreach a,b in array(array(1,2,3))
>>>
>>> Also, what about:
>>>
>>> foreach a,b in '{{{1,2},{3,4}},{{5,6},{7,8}}}'::int[] ?
>>
>>
>>
>> postgres=# select array(select
>> unnest('{{{1,2},{3,4}},{{5,6},{7,8}}}'::int[]));
>> array
>> -------------------
>> {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}
>> (1 row)
>>
>> so it generate pairs {1,2}{3,4},{5,6},{7,8}
>>
>
> I fixed situation when array has not enough elements.
>

This no longer applies due to conflicts in src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c
caused by e524cbdc45ec6d677b1dd49

Also, what is the relationship of this patch to the row_to_array patch?
Are they independent, or does one depend on the other? row_to_array by
itself applies but doesn't compile.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-03-28 22:59:31 Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2015-03-28 22:53:29 Re: PATCH: pgbench - merging transaction logs