On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 8:43 PM Tatsuya Kawata
<kawatatatsuya0913(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. Yes, it's the same query as yours. I just
> wanted to note that without asserts it silently returns wrong results
> (1 row instead of 4) rather than raising an error, in case that's
> useful for the back-patch decision.
Thanks! Yeah, this warrants a back-patch. I've pushed the fix and
back-patched it to all supported branches.
- Richard