Re: Eager aggregation, take 3

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul George <p(dot)a(dot)george19(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Eager aggregation, take 3
Date: 2025-10-06 00:59:11
Message-ID: CAMbWs4_W6PmVXxgqM8LMerX2iwqOwR5EC5RGWSAMuvkm8o+-jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:09 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> FWIW, I plan to do another self-review of this patch soon, with the
> goal of assessing whether it's ready to be pushed. If anyone has any
> concerns about any part of the patch or would like to review it, I
> would greatly appreciate hearing from you.

Barring any objections, I'll plan to push v23 in a couple of days.

- Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-10-06 00:59:16 Should we update the random_page_cost default value?
Previous Message Richard Guo 2025-10-06 00:56:25 Re: Eager aggregation, take 3