| From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Correction of RowMark Removal During Sel-Join Elimination |
| Date: | 2026-01-05 01:31:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAMbWs48j6KXGku3C4Oysc88xJihG+cOdhJUf01nnnyOhC+nTrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 5:38 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is there anything left for this thread now? There's still a CF entry
> [1] for this. Can the status be updated according to the current
> situation? I see the CF entry's tags claim this is a "BugFix" and
> "Refactoring Only". It can't be both of those. If work still needs to
> be done here, can the tags also be fixed?
I don't think there is anything left for this thread, so I've gone
ahead and closed it. I also removed the 'Refactoring Only' label
since it didn't really apply anyway (not sure why it was added in the
first place).
- Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-01-05 01:41:53 | Re: Proposal - Enabling btree_gist by default |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-01-05 01:18:23 | Re: Proposal - Enabling btree_gist by default |