| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Correction of RowMark Removal During Sel-Join Elimination |
| Date: | 2026-01-04 08:38:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvo2N+Zpni4XPeFNo2+Sn2AdBztOHoR+ZboBduwiKQgw4g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 31 Aug 2025 at 13:04, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 9:50 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 2:51 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I think it's better to push this patch sooner rather than later, as
> > > multiple people have encountered the issue in different ways. I'll go
> > > ahead and push 0001 from my patch set shortly.
>
> > I see. You're much farther than I'm. Please, go ahead pushing this.
>
> Done.
Is there anything left for this thread now? There's still a CF entry
[1] for this. Can the status be updated according to the current
situation? I see the CF entry's tags claim this is a "BugFix" and
"Refactoring Only". It can't be both of those. If work still needs to
be done here, can the tags also be fixed?
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2026-01-04 09:20:00 | Re: Small optimization set tuple block/tableOid once |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2026-01-04 07:48:51 | Re: intarray: fix an edge case int32 overflow bug |