From: | Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: idle_in_transaction_session_timeout for a set of SQL statements |
Date: | 2019-02-27 16:51:48 |
Message-ID: | CAMa1XUhCFu4SxHpX0Ef3xaa1OJb7_zdVS=Li9T_EjQdqH7Efuw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> SET lock_timeout TO '1s';
>
No, my assumption is that lock_timeout does not cover my use case here. My
point is actually that any one statement is not hitting lock_timeout, but
as a whole the transaction takes too long. For example if I set
lock_timeout to 1 second, but my migration actually has 10 SQL statements
each of which take just under a second, I have a total now of a near
10-second lockout.
Regardless of whether or not I am technically going idle, I want to be able
to abort based on transaction time length. I do believe I can handle this
externally via the timeout command, but curious still if there is any way
to reliably do it from within postgres.
Thanks,
Jeremy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Fletcher | 2019-02-27 16:52:09 | Re: Barman disaster recovery solution |
Previous Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2019-02-27 16:49:12 | Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA? |