| From: | Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kacper Kuras <kacperkuras(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: SELECT * EXCLUDE (...) command |
| Date: | 2026-10-30 07:06:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAMWA6yZPJbS_mU0HXfh7Dzx2gUZT4w2wFd-2YnNVnYZFJOb-Qw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Kacper,
> From my side the patch looks ready, so I'm marking it Ready for
> Committer. The main open question is whether the behavior matches
> what was accepted into the standard, e.g. for ambiguous names, and
> that needs Peter's input.
Thank you for reviewing the patches.
My colleague, Christoph, pointed out that the patch was missing the
RETURNING part of the documentation. I also noticed that the staroptions
syntax needs to be added to the SELECT INTO documentation page as well.
The documentation needs a few updates, so a new version of the patch is
required.
Meanwhile, we can also wait for further clarification on the standards side.
Regards,
Hunaid Sohail
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2026-10-30 07:14:38 | Re: [PG19] pg_upgrade --check passes, then the upgrade fails |
| Previous Message | Jeevan Chalke | 2026-10-30 06:59:41 | PL/pgSQL: "missing X at end of SQL expression" is never reported at end of input |